Review



non accelerating rotating rod  (Columbus Instruments)


Bioz Verified Symbol Columbus Instruments is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Columbus Instruments manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Columbus Instruments non accelerating rotating rod
    a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. <t>Rotarod</t> assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.
    Non Accelerating Rotating Rod, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1656 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/non accelerating rotating rod/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 96 stars, based on 1656 article reviews
    non accelerating rotating rod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Preventing Microglial Reactivity Protects from Acute and Progressive Neuronal Dysfunction, Motor Impairments and Sedation following Alcohol Abuse"

    Article Title: Preventing Microglial Reactivity Protects from Acute and Progressive Neuronal Dysfunction, Motor Impairments and Sedation following Alcohol Abuse

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2025.06.12.658437

    a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. Rotarod assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. Rotarod assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Techniques Used: Epifluorescence Microscopy, Labeling, Saline, Comparison, Clinical Proteomics, Confocal Microscopy

    a. Schematic diagram of experimental design for the assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments. (i) rotarod and locomotor activity cage assessments performed after the first and second day of binge ethanol oral administration (2 g/kg BW). (ii) Loss of righting reflex (LORR) assessment after a single intraperitoneal injection of 3.5 g EtOH/kg BW. b. Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod on day 1 of the 10-day ethanol course. n = 19 ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 21 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F and n = 14 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (trials to stay), and Friedman with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (latency to fall). c. Total beam breaks recorded in the locomotor activity cage over 2 hours after ethanol administration on day 2 of the 10-day ethanol course. Saline control data were collected one day before ethanol course initiation, as described in ( a ( i )). Data binned every 5 minutes. n = 5 Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 9 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F , n = 8 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. d. Latency to LORR and duration of LORR following treatment as described in ( a(ii) ). n = 9 MyD88 F/F and n = 13 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Unpaired t-test. e. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 3 and 10 of binge ethanol exposure (2g/kg BW, n = 7-8 mice / group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. f. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 1 of binge ethanol exposure (5g/kg BW). n = 8 mice/group. Unpaired t-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.
    Figure Legend Snippet: a. Schematic diagram of experimental design for the assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments. (i) rotarod and locomotor activity cage assessments performed after the first and second day of binge ethanol oral administration (2 g/kg BW). (ii) Loss of righting reflex (LORR) assessment after a single intraperitoneal injection of 3.5 g EtOH/kg BW. b. Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod on day 1 of the 10-day ethanol course. n = 19 ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 21 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F and n = 14 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (trials to stay), and Friedman with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (latency to fall). c. Total beam breaks recorded in the locomotor activity cage over 2 hours after ethanol administration on day 2 of the 10-day ethanol course. Saline control data were collected one day before ethanol course initiation, as described in ( a ( i )). Data binned every 5 minutes. n = 5 Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 9 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F , n = 8 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. d. Latency to LORR and duration of LORR following treatment as described in ( a(ii) ). n = 9 MyD88 F/F and n = 13 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Unpaired t-test. e. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 3 and 10 of binge ethanol exposure (2g/kg BW, n = 7-8 mice / group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. f. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 1 of binge ethanol exposure (5g/kg BW). n = 8 mice/group. Unpaired t-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Injection, Comparison, Saline, Control, Concentration Assay, Clinical Proteomics



    Similar Products

    non accelerating rotating rod  (Columbus Instruments)
    96
    Columbus Instruments non accelerating rotating rod
    a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. <t>Rotarod</t> assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.
    Non Accelerating Rotating Rod, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/non accelerating rotating rod/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    non accelerating rotating rod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rota rod rotamex 5  (Columbus Instruments)
    96
    Columbus Instruments rota rod rotamex 5
    a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. <t>Rotarod</t> assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.
    Rota Rod Rotamex 5, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rota rod rotamex 5/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rota rod rotamex 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. Rotarod assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Preventing Microglial Reactivity Protects from Acute and Progressive Neuronal Dysfunction, Motor Impairments and Sedation following Alcohol Abuse

    doi: 10.1101/2025.06.12.658437

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in somatosensory cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F ;Rosa26 tdTomato mice after 10 consecutive days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. b. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per field of view (FOV) in somatosensory cortex of mice treated as described in ( a ). n = 4-6 mice per group. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c. Representative epifluorescence microscopy images of NeuN-labeled neurons in prefrontal cortex of saline- and ethanol-treated MyD88 -/- , MyD88 F/F , and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice after 10 days of treatment. Scale bar, 100 µm. d. Quantification of NeuN + neurons per FOV in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. e. Rotarod assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments following a single binge ethanol exposure (2 g/kg BW). Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod for ethanol-treated MyD88 F/F (n=5) and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F (n=9) mice. Unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, respectively. f. Quantification of blood ethanol levels in plasma samples collected on day 3 of binge ethanol exposure (5 g/kg BW) from MyD88 F/F and Cx3cr1cre Tg/0 ;MyD88 F/F mice. n = 5–6 mice per group. Unpaired t-test. g. Representative confocal microscopy images of Iba1-labeled microglia in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ) on day 10 of binge ethanol exposure. Scale bar, 10 µm. h, i. Sholl analysis (h) and quantification of microglial process volume, process length and branch points (i) in prefrontal cortex of mice treated as described in ( c ). n = 5 mice per group. Data presented as mean ± SEM. d, i: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; h: Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Article Snippet: Mice were placed on a non-accelerating rotating rod (fixed speed at 16 rpm, 3 cm diameter rod, 44.5 cm height, Rotamex-5; Columbus Instruments).

    Techniques: Epifluorescence Microscopy, Labeling, Saline, Comparison, Clinical Proteomics, Confocal Microscopy

    a. Schematic diagram of experimental design for the assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments. (i) rotarod and locomotor activity cage assessments performed after the first and second day of binge ethanol oral administration (2 g/kg BW). (ii) Loss of righting reflex (LORR) assessment after a single intraperitoneal injection of 3.5 g EtOH/kg BW. b. Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod on day 1 of the 10-day ethanol course. n = 19 ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 21 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F and n = 14 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (trials to stay), and Friedman with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (latency to fall). c. Total beam breaks recorded in the locomotor activity cage over 2 hours after ethanol administration on day 2 of the 10-day ethanol course. Saline control data were collected one day before ethanol course initiation, as described in ( a ( i )). Data binned every 5 minutes. n = 5 Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 9 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F , n = 8 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. d. Latency to LORR and duration of LORR following treatment as described in ( a(ii) ). n = 9 MyD88 F/F and n = 13 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Unpaired t-test. e. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 3 and 10 of binge ethanol exposure (2g/kg BW, n = 7-8 mice / group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. f. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 1 of binge ethanol exposure (5g/kg BW). n = 8 mice/group. Unpaired t-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Preventing Microglial Reactivity Protects from Acute and Progressive Neuronal Dysfunction, Motor Impairments and Sedation following Alcohol Abuse

    doi: 10.1101/2025.06.12.658437

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Schematic diagram of experimental design for the assessment of ethanol-induced motor impairments. (i) rotarod and locomotor activity cage assessments performed after the first and second day of binge ethanol oral administration (2 g/kg BW). (ii) Loss of righting reflex (LORR) assessment after a single intraperitoneal injection of 3.5 g EtOH/kg BW. b. Number of trials to stay on the rod and latency to falling off the rotarod on day 1 of the 10-day ethanol course. n = 19 ethanol-treated Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 21 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F and n = 14 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (trials to stay), and Friedman with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (latency to fall). c. Total beam breaks recorded in the locomotor activity cage over 2 hours after ethanol administration on day 2 of the 10-day ethanol course. Saline control data were collected one day before ethanol course initiation, as described in ( a ( i )). Data binned every 5 minutes. n = 5 Cx3cr1 GFP/+ , n = 9 Cx3cr1 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F , n = 8 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. d. Latency to LORR and duration of LORR following treatment as described in ( a(ii) ). n = 9 MyD88 F/F and n = 13 Tmem119 creERT2 ;MyD88 F/F mice. Unpaired t-test. e. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 3 and 10 of binge ethanol exposure (2g/kg BW, n = 7-8 mice / group). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. f. Quantification of blood ethanol concentration in plasma samples on day 1 of binge ethanol exposure (5g/kg BW). n = 8 mice/group. Unpaired t-test. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Only statistically significant comparisons are shown.

    Article Snippet: Mice were placed on a non-accelerating rotating rod (fixed speed at 16 rpm, 3 cm diameter rod, 44.5 cm height, Rotamex-5; Columbus Instruments).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Injection, Comparison, Saline, Control, Concentration Assay, Clinical Proteomics